As I recall from George Orwell's '1984,' it was not enough that the protagonist verbally agreed that 2+2=5, he had to really believe it.And now, it is not enough that we politely agree with a deluded (or cheating) man that he is a woman, or vice versa, we have to act as if we believe it. So science, (as in chromosomes XY means male, and XX means female) has to be ignored. Biological fact must be cast aside in favour of ideological nonsense. And those who do not go along with the nonsense are punished.
Luckily, this tripe has not truly affected most of us so far, but unless common sense enjoys a resurgence, then it will, inevitably.
There are some things that do not matter much, for example, the waste of money that is involved in providing women's sanitary products in boys' toilets. Or the assertion that there is a 'female penis.' That was a Transgender person who calls himself a woman, and says that therefore his penis must be a 'female penis.'
 |
| Hayden Cross |
The poster to the right is of a 1994 movie, 'Junior.' They would have been astounded that 25 years later, people are actually talking about men having babies.
And they are not supposed to laugh, but rather, accept it without a blink.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4676182/Britain-s-pregnant-man-gives-birth-baby-girl.html
Women's Sport:
Women's sport is important. It is such a shame that a man can now claim to be woman, and win money, fame and championships. And when they do, they are more likely to be praised for their 'courage' and being 'true to their own selves,' than they are to be criticized for being blatant cheats.
Just a few years ago, it would have been assumed that very few men would have so little self respect that they would call themselves women merely in order to win prizes. But it is becoming more and more common.
The Olympic Games are to be in 2020. As far as I know, the only limits put on biological males competing in women's events is that their Testosterone level must be below a certain level. And there are some individuals protesting even that feeble limit - 'discrimination,' they say. And 'invasion of privacy.'
Female athletes are labelled 'Transphobic' if they dare object, and may lose their places on their team, or may be barred from representing their country.
A few are finally starting to object as more and more men take the prizes from women. Mostly, so far, it has almost always only been those who have retired from competitive sports, such as Martina Navratilova, retired tennis player.
"Players born as men simply have too many advantages, no matter how many hormones they take," she says, and has suffered a lot of criticism for stating this obvious fact.
There is also the matter of a woman's safety in contact sports. A martial arts competitor, Fallon Fox, caused considerable damage to 'her' opponent, Tamikka Brents, whose eye injury resulted in a damaged orbital bone that required seven staples.
In a post-fight interview, Brents said, "I've never felt so overpowered ever in my life.” And that was because she was fighting a man, and not a woman.
https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/transgender-mma-fighter-destroys-female-opponent/
Left: Fallon Fox defeating another female opponent, Tamikka Brents.
Brents had the temerity to say something, but in the article I saw, was heavily criticized for it.
"Players born as men simply have too many advantages, no matter how many hormones they take," she says, and has suffered a lot of criticism for stating this obvious fact.
There is also the matter of a woman's safety in contact sports. A martial arts competitor, Fallon Fox, caused considerable damage to 'her' opponent, Tamikka Brents, whose eye injury resulted in a damaged orbital bone that required seven staples.
In a post-fight interview, Brents said, "I've never felt so overpowered ever in my life.” And that was because she was fighting a man, and not a woman.
https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/transgender-mma-fighter-destroys-female-opponent/
Left: Fallon Fox defeating another female opponent, Tamikka Brents.
Brents had the temerity to say something, but in the article I saw, was heavily criticized for it.
To demonstrate the absurdity of the pretense that a woman is the same as a TG 'woman,' a chap who calls himself 'Rapper Zuby' stated he now identified as a woman, and broke the women's weight-lifting record. And then he re-identified as a man."I keep hearing about how biological men don't have any physical strength advantage over women in 2019...
So watch me DESTROY the British Women's deadlift record without trying.
P.S. I identified as a woman whilst lifting the weight. Don't be a bigot." Zuby, Feb, 2019.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BqlQlUNs8A&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0afTqwf1nWqcQVNCaFkSpNtvti_aaay-jyIoIbLsze8Tg9YO0kH47B3Qs
Women's Safety
The nonsense that a man can be a woman merely because he says so, is compromising women's safety, and not just in competitive sports.
Women's toilets:
In some areas, there have been changes to rules, sometimes actual laws, that individuals can use the toilet they are 'most comfortable with.' This, of course, can compromise the comfort and the safety of others. I read a story just yesterday, of American highschool girls objecting to a TG 'girl' with male genitalia using their change-room. There are others, girls finally having the courage to brave the accusations of bigotry.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2015/12/21/why-these-high-school-girls-dont-want-transgender-student-a-in-their-locker-room/
They need to be brave, as attacks will follow the ' wrongthink.' I have even experienced this myself, when I said (online) that I did not like 'unisex' toilets. The comment was: 'So you must want to look at men's penises, so are you the pervert?' (Just for the record, in the opinion of most women, a man's penis is not the object of beauty that the man himself seems to think.)
A Washington restaurant had to pay a fine for questioning an individual who was using the women's restrooms. They also had to post a notice saying that "that, under D.C. law, everyone is allowed to use the restroom that matches their gender identity or expression."
https://www.theblaze.com/news/dc-restaurant-fined-for-questioning-gender
So the employee who questioned the man was punished, and the restaurant was punished.
Every time this sort of thing happens, women are less safe. It is a problem that some transgender 'women' are so ready to become aggressive when other people do not recognize they are supposed to be women. I am thinking of the video that went viral of an individual becoming furious that someone called him 'Sir' instead of 'Ma'am. "I am 'Ma'am," he was bellowing.
Luckily, women who 'transition' to men are either not as aggressive, or I have not happened to hear about problems they cause.
Hospital wards:
Except for Intensive Care wards, where the patients are too sick to care, hospital wards have traditionally been separated into male and female wards. Will that be ended? Will you find a man who pretends to be a woman (or thinks he is a woman) in the next bed to you in hospital? Will you have to put up with his snoring, or his intrusive staring when you are at your most vulnerable?
Probably, you will. And if you object, then suddenly, you could be labelled as intolerant or 'transphobic.' If an employee, you risk losing your job for your 'non- inclusive' attitude.
Women's Refuges:
It is biological fact that most men are bigger and stronger than most women, and some men use that to bully their wives or partners. These women need protection, and that is why we have women's refuges. Is it now 'discrimination' to say that no men are allowed?
The 'Hope Center' in Anchorage, (Alaska) is fighting the city council who are trying to tell them that they must admit any man who calls himself a woman.
At the time of the article, 2018, they were resisting. If discrimination laws are brought against them, they are likely to be defeated and then the women-only spaces will no longer be women only. When men are admitted, no matter if they wear a dress, then those areas are less safe.
Probably, you will. And if you object, then suddenly, you could be labelled as intolerant or 'transphobic.' If an employee, you risk losing your job for your 'non- inclusive' attitude.
Women's Refuges:
It is biological fact that most men are bigger and stronger than most women, and some men use that to bully their wives or partners. These women need protection, and that is why we have women's refuges. Is it now 'discrimination' to say that no men are allowed?
The 'Hope Center' in Anchorage, (Alaska) is fighting the city council who are trying to tell them that they must admit any man who calls himself a woman.
At the time of the article, 2018, they were resisting. If discrimination laws are brought against them, they are likely to be defeated and then the women-only spaces will no longer be women only. When men are admitted, no matter if they wear a dress, then those areas are less safe.
https://www.adn.com/opinions/2018/12/06/anchorage-threatens-womens-shelter-for-serving-women/?fbclid=IwAR19gXkaywNcxfNPfFhY3baHWmxmbawIEGieBqUdr-cAQGS5FA3RAkliYL0
Women's prisons:
When I spoke of this concern to someone, I was assured that female prisoners are a lot tougher than most women. But so are male prisoners, and they are almost always bigger and stronger than women. So now, men who call themselves women, have been placed in women's prisons, where they are free to intimidate or rape as they choose.
One example is a chap called Martin Ponting, who was convicted of the rapes of two young girls. Once in prison, he decided to be a woman instead. So 'Jessica Winfield' was moved to a women-only prison (despite still having a perfectly usable penis) but then had to be isolated because he was making unwanted advances to the real women.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4400327/transgender-rapist-womens-prison/
In 2017, Australia, a very violent individual attacked random people with an axe. The person has a man's build and face and calls himself Evie Amarti. The photos of him wielding that axe are horrific.
Women's prisons:
When I spoke of this concern to someone, I was assured that female prisoners are a lot tougher than most women. But so are male prisoners, and they are almost always bigger and stronger than women. So now, men who call themselves women, have been placed in women's prisons, where they are free to intimidate or rape as they choose.
One example is a chap called Martin Ponting, who was convicted of the rapes of two young girls. Once in prison, he decided to be a woman instead. So 'Jessica Winfield' was moved to a women-only prison (despite still having a perfectly usable penis) but then had to be isolated because he was making unwanted advances to the real women.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4400327/transgender-rapist-womens-prison/
In 2017, Australia, a very violent individual attacked random people with an axe. The person has a man's build and face and calls himself Evie Amarti. The photos of him wielding that axe are horrific.
One of his victims is Sharon Hacker, shown left.
"Evie Amarti" is now in a women's prison. His fellow prisoners are less safe than they were.
Britain is the first country to open a special prison for men pretending to be women, after several instances of rapes of real women by TG 'women.' Predictably, transgender activists are objecting on the grounds that it is discriminatory. I think it is high time it was pointed out that discrimination is a necessary thing, not a bad thing. Try being non-discriminatory when you eat fungi, for instance. It does not work.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/03/04/uk-transgender-prison-sex-attacks/
They are trying to say that there is no difference between transgender 'women' and real women. In many workplaces, people are obliged to pretend to believe that in order to keep their jobs.
Of course, there are differences. That is not 'bigoted,' it is factual, especially as it is apparently no longer necessary for a man to do anything more to 'become' a woman than declare that he now 'identifies as' a woman. Absurd, but the PC mob would have us believe it.
2 + 2 = 5, and we can be punished if we don't appear to fully believe it.
Punishment:
In some areas, punishments are becoming more severe for those who do not appear to believe that a man is a woman or vice versa. Nearly all men who call themselves women are clearly and obviously, still men. And the ones who still look most like men seem to be the ones who become most irate if someone makes a mistake. Complaints, law suits, even violence against the one who does not know a 'Ma'am' when he sees a man.
Genuine errors have not so far been punished legally, as far as I know. But more places are now punishing when it is deemed that the 'misgendering' or 'deadnaming' might be deliberate.
New York City, for instance, issued guidelines that state that businesses and property owners must use an individual's preferred pronoun, (as in Ms. Mrs, Mr, but also 'Ze' or 'they,') or face a possible fine of up to $250,000. It is hard to believe they would actually do that, and they do say "for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct."
Still, what other rudeness could possibly be punished so severely?
New York City is not alone. Canada has become a very 'progressive' country, though most of what is called 'progressive' these days, smacks rather of lunacy.
Ontario, 2017. A chap called Bill Whatcott passed out flyers that stated that one of the local candidates for Parliament was a man, not a woman. And up until five years before, the candidate had lived as a married man with children, so it was no lie. It was also a fact that those about to vote were entitled to take into consideration.
Whatcott was arrested, imprisoned, and had to pay a fine of $55,000 for committing a 'hate crime.'
https://www.afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/04/fined-55-000-for-calling-a-male-a-male/
Also in Canada, a man has been threatened with arrest if he refers to his child by its true gender. Hormone blockers were given to the child without the parents' consent. He/she was fourteen at the time. And there was an additional order made that rules that the father "will henceforth be subject to arrest, immediately and “without warrant” if any police officer has “reasonable” grounds to believe that he has in any way referred to his daughter as a girl in public or in private."
https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/29/authorities-arrest-canadian-father-refers-trans-child-real-sex/?fbclid=IwAR0FarLhvx_mlUn2irF3Ibg83NjHJ008DGSKApRUGHQB8RWFG-sqgQEimTo
In Britain, a woman was arrested for stating that a man was not a woman. She was arrested in front of her children, which must have been traumatizing for them, and spent seven hours in prison. This is Britain, once the bastion of fair play.
https://hotair.com/archives/2019/02/10/british-woman-arrested-identifying-gender-transgender-attorney/
Newborn babies, 'assigned' sex.
Some of those who now say that gender is fluid, and who talk about, not whether a newborn baby is boy or girl, but instead, speak of their 'doctor-assigned gender,' have made some extraordinary wins. Tasmania (Australia) has actually passed a law that makes stating the sex of a baby, optional on birth certificates. Admittedly, there are some very rare babies with ambiguous genitalia, but normally, it is perfectly obvious whether a baby is a boy or a girl. Some people want to deny biological fact.
We are yet to see what implications this extraordinary decision will have.
Children's Safety:
Most sinister of all is what some parents are doing with their children, or allowing others to do. Teaching a young child that he can be the other sex if he chooses is a very bad idea. A three-year-old boy is likely to notice that his sister gets to wear far fancier clothing than he does, so he could try, "I want to wear a dress."
Before this modern fad, the parents would laugh and probably agree he could wear a dress for a bit if he chose. There is NO WAY they would agree that he could somehow change to be a girl.
And a girl of six or seven might notice that men get to do more exciting things, and declare herself 'really' a boy.
"Evie Amarti" is now in a women's prison. His fellow prisoners are less safe than they were.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/03/04/uk-transgender-prison-sex-attacks/
They are trying to say that there is no difference between transgender 'women' and real women. In many workplaces, people are obliged to pretend to believe that in order to keep their jobs.
Of course, there are differences. That is not 'bigoted,' it is factual, especially as it is apparently no longer necessary for a man to do anything more to 'become' a woman than declare that he now 'identifies as' a woman. Absurd, but the PC mob would have us believe it.
2 + 2 = 5, and we can be punished if we don't appear to fully believe it.
Punishment:
In some areas, punishments are becoming more severe for those who do not appear to believe that a man is a woman or vice versa. Nearly all men who call themselves women are clearly and obviously, still men. And the ones who still look most like men seem to be the ones who become most irate if someone makes a mistake. Complaints, law suits, even violence against the one who does not know a 'Ma'am' when he sees a man.
Genuine errors have not so far been punished legally, as far as I know. But more places are now punishing when it is deemed that the 'misgendering' or 'deadnaming' might be deliberate.
New York City, for instance, issued guidelines that state that businesses and property owners must use an individual's preferred pronoun, (as in Ms. Mrs, Mr, but also 'Ze' or 'they,') or face a possible fine of up to $250,000. It is hard to believe they would actually do that, and they do say "for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct."
Still, what other rudeness could possibly be punished so severely?
New York City is not alone. Canada has become a very 'progressive' country, though most of what is called 'progressive' these days, smacks rather of lunacy.
Ontario, 2017. A chap called Bill Whatcott passed out flyers that stated that one of the local candidates for Parliament was a man, not a woman. And up until five years before, the candidate had lived as a married man with children, so it was no lie. It was also a fact that those about to vote were entitled to take into consideration.
Whatcott was arrested, imprisoned, and had to pay a fine of $55,000 for committing a 'hate crime.'
https://www.afa.net/the-stand/culture/2019/04/fined-55-000-for-calling-a-male-a-male/
Also in Canada, a man has been threatened with arrest if he refers to his child by its true gender. Hormone blockers were given to the child without the parents' consent. He/she was fourteen at the time. And there was an additional order made that rules that the father "will henceforth be subject to arrest, immediately and “without warrant” if any police officer has “reasonable” grounds to believe that he has in any way referred to his daughter as a girl in public or in private."
https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/29/authorities-arrest-canadian-father-refers-trans-child-real-sex/?fbclid=IwAR0FarLhvx_mlUn2irF3Ibg83NjHJ008DGSKApRUGHQB8RWFG-sqgQEimTo
In Britain, a woman was arrested for stating that a man was not a woman. She was arrested in front of her children, which must have been traumatizing for them, and spent seven hours in prison. This is Britain, once the bastion of fair play.
Some of those who now say that gender is fluid, and who talk about, not whether a newborn baby is boy or girl, but instead, speak of their 'doctor-assigned gender,' have made some extraordinary wins. Tasmania (Australia) has actually passed a law that makes stating the sex of a baby, optional on birth certificates. Admittedly, there are some very rare babies with ambiguous genitalia, but normally, it is perfectly obvious whether a baby is a boy or a girl. Some people want to deny biological fact.We are yet to see what implications this extraordinary decision will have.
Children's Safety:
Most sinister of all is what some parents are doing with their children, or allowing others to do. Teaching a young child that he can be the other sex if he chooses is a very bad idea. A three-year-old boy is likely to notice that his sister gets to wear far fancier clothing than he does, so he could try, "I want to wear a dress."
Before this modern fad, the parents would laugh and probably agree he could wear a dress for a bit if he chose. There is NO WAY they would agree that he could somehow change to be a girl.
 |
| Cowboy girl |
And a girl of six or seven might notice that men get to do more exciting things, and declare herself 'really' a boy.
A sensible parent would point out that girls can do exciting things as well if they choose.
These days, though, some parents are likely to take the child to a clinic and maybe even start treatment that will damage her health. It will not, cannot, turn her into a boy. She will probably be made sterile.
And that boy will not turn into a girl, even with surgery that makes his genitalia look less masculine.
In many Australian public schools, small children are taught the nonsense that gender is 'fluid.' Gender is not fluid. You are XX, female, or XY, male. (There are very rare exceptions.)
Teaching a child that gender is not set at conception is wrong.
These days, though, some parents are likely to take the child to a clinic and maybe even start treatment that will damage her health. It will not, cannot, turn her into a boy. She will probably be made sterile.
And that boy will not turn into a girl, even with surgery that makes his genitalia look less masculine.
In many Australian public schools, small children are taught the nonsense that gender is 'fluid.' Gender is not fluid. You are XX, female, or XY, male. (There are very rare exceptions.)
Teaching a child that gender is not set at conception is wrong.
It is child abuse.
So far, they have not tried to change a child into a dog when he states he is 'really' a dog. Children like to pretend. But maybe that will be next.
And what about those strange adults whose kink is that they are ponies? Are we supposed to believe those as well?
We know there is a middle-aged man who says he is a six-year-old girl. It is hard to believe that he has found a man and woman who agree to pretend they are his parents.
Worse, the couple have a real daughter. I do not like the thought of a young girl growing up with an unrelated and obviously kinky man in the same home. How much chance has that real little girl have of growing up unmolested?
There must be a lot more eunuchs around now. Some years ago, I wrote a series of books about a boy turned eunuch. The first was called 'Not a Man,' written in 2010, so I was trying to research in 2009. I wanted to know more about the effects of castration before puberty.
I found almost nothing.
So, 1984. Two plus two equals five. We know it is wrong, and yet Transgender activists would force us to act as if it is true. What miserable individuals these activists must be, maybe never happy with themselves.
Are there transgender people who are happy in their new personality? Maybe there are some who are not worried what other people think, and simply go about their lives. Those ones could be happy.
Two plus two does not equal five, and wanting it to be so, does not make it so.
ZUBY:
✔@ZubyMusic
· Feb 26, 2019
I keep hearing about how biological men don't have any physical strength advantage over women in 2019...
So watch me DESTROY the British Women's deadlift record without trying.
P.S. I identified as a woman whilst lifting the weight. Don't be a bigot.
So far, they have not tried to change a child into a dog when he states he is 'really' a dog. Children like to pretend. But maybe that will be next.
And what about those strange adults whose kink is that they are ponies? Are we supposed to believe those as well?
Worse, the couple have a real daughter. I do not like the thought of a young girl growing up with an unrelated and obviously kinky man in the same home. How much chance has that real little girl have of growing up unmolested?
There must be a lot more eunuchs around now. Some years ago, I wrote a series of books about a boy turned eunuch. The first was called 'Not a Man,' written in 2010, so I was trying to research in 2009. I wanted to know more about the effects of castration before puberty.I found almost nothing.
Just 10 years later, and things are so different, except they don't call the castrated boys 'eunuchs;' they say they have 'transitioned,' and they are now girls. And as there is a push from transgender activists for candidates to 'transition' before puberty, there are going to be a lot more eunuchs around, eunuchs that include normal boys castrated before puberty. A lot of those, inevitably, will be very much regretting that premature decision to mutilate their bodies and to destroy their natural sex drive. In another 10 years, it will probably be far easier to research the effects of castration. That is hardly a good thing!
So, 1984. Two plus two equals five. We know it is wrong, and yet Transgender activists would force us to act as if it is true. What miserable individuals these activists must be, maybe never happy with themselves.Are there transgender people who are happy in their new personality? Maybe there are some who are not worried what other people think, and simply go about their lives. Those ones could be happy.
But no matter what he does with surgery, hormones, and self deception, a man will never be a woman. A woman will never be a man. We are different. That is the way biology works.
Two plus two does not equal five, and wanting it to be so, does not make it so.
ZUBY:
✔@ZubyMusic
· Feb 26, 2019
I keep hearing about how biological men don't have any physical strength advantage over women in 2019...
So watch me DESTROY the British Women's deadlift record without trying.
P.S. I identified as a woman whilst lifting the weight. Don't be a bigot.
No comments:
Post a Comment